62px
62px
Microservices · Kubernetes · Cyprus

Microservice Architecture from €4990 — honest about the trade-offs

Independent releases, fault isolation, per-service scaling. But you pay for it in infrastructure, observability and distributed transactions. We'll tell you when it's worth it — and when it isn't.

€4990
Starting price
for architecture design
3–4 wks
Design phase
before any code
6–10 wks
First extracted service
in production
1 st
Rule: prove you need it
before you build it
Who this is not for

Read this before you buy microservices

One team, one release cycle

If you deploy once a week and one team owns the whole codebase, microservices will only slow you down. A modular monolith gets you 80% of the structure at 20% of the operational cost.

No independent scaling needs

When your entire system peaks together — say, a seasonal promotion — you don't need to scale pieces separately. One well-tuned monolith behind a load balancer is simpler and cheaper to run.

Early-stage product, unclear boundaries

If you're still discovering your domain, service boundaries will be wrong next month. Splitting too early means you'll be paying refactoring costs across network boundaries instead of inside one process.

Small team, no DevOps capacity

Microservices demand someone who owns Kubernetes, observability, CI/CD pipelines and on-call. If that person is also your backend developer, you're hiring for a burnout, not building a system.

Tight budget reality check

A modest microservices setup starts at €300–600/month for infrastructure alone — before your team's time. Add monitoring, logging, message queues and managed Kubernetes, and you're at €1,000+ monthly. That's the honest price of entry.

When it actually pays off

Microservices earn their keep when you have multiple teams shipping on different rhythms, one component under 10x more load, availability requirements that vary by feature, or regulatory data isolation.

The cost you're really paying

You trade release independence for infrastructure, observability and distributed transaction headaches. If you can't name the service boundary you need tomorrow, don't split today.

Process

How we break a monolith into services — without breaking the business

01

Honest audit: do you even need microservices?

We map team structure, release bottlenecks, load peaks and data isolation requirements. If a modular monolith covers it, we say so. If not, we define service boundaries around business capabilities, not technical convenience.

02

Designing the target architecture

We design the API gateway, event flow (Kafka or RabbitMQ), saga patterns for cross-service operations, idempotency keys and tracing. You get a blueprint your team can actually operate — not a diagram that looks good in a deck.

03

Extracting the first service — strangler fig approach

We pick one bounded context, usually the one with the highest load or regulatory pressure, and route traffic to it gradually. The monolith keeps working. No big-bang rewrite, no six-month feature freeze.

04

Handover: running it in production

We set up containers, Kubernetes manifests, logging and distributed tracing. We document runbooks and on-call procedures. You leave with the first service live and a team that knows how to run the rest.

Pricing · Microservices

Microservices architecture pricing

All prices include a discount for permission to publish your case study.

Assessment
from €4990

Architecture review and a pragmatic decomposition plan. 3-4 weeks.

  • Audit of your monolith and team structure
  • Bounded contexts by business capability
  • Strangler fig roadmap, first service scoped
  • Infrastructure and observability budget estimate
  • Honest verdict: do you actually need this?
Start here
Multi-service
from €29900

Several services, cross-team pipelines, operational handover. From 12 weeks.

  • Independent release cadence per team
  • Isolation for high-load or regulated domains
  • Shared observability stack and runbooks
  • Contract testing between services
  • Ops training for your team
Discuss
Microservices architecture

When microservices actually make sense

Why clients choose us

4 reasons to work with us

Start today

A short brief over Zoom — and we're already designing the mockup. No 30-page spec, no two-week sign-off.

Below-market price

From €290 in exchange for publishing your case. A fixed sum in the contract — no "surprise" surcharges along the way.

Full transparency

Reports every 3 days, tasks in a tracker, a chat on Telegram. You see progress in real time without "so when?".

Guarantees in the contract

30 days of free support, a refund at any stage if it doesn't fit, fixed deadlines.

About microservices

Microservices architecture — the honest version

Let's start with who should not buy this. If you have one team, one codebase, and traffic that fits comfortably on a couple of servers, microservices will cost you money and buy you pain. The same goes for startups still searching for product-market fit: you'll be restructuring services every two weeks while competitors ship features. A modular monolith gets you 80% of the organisational benefits at a fraction of the operational cost.

Microservices earn their keep when you have several teams working at different rhythms and need to release independently. Or when one part of the system takes ten times the load of everything else and you want to scale it separately. Or when different components have genuinely different availability requirements — say, checkout must never go down while the recommendation engine can afford to fail. Regulatory data isolation is another honest trigger: keeping payment data in a separate service with its own access controls is often simpler than trying to prove isolation inside a monolith.

What you're actually buying is release independence and fault isolation. What you're paying with is infrastructure, observability, and the disappearance of simple database transactions. A single user action may now span three services, and "just roll back" becomes a distributed problem. You'll need an API gateway, message queues like Kafka or RabbitMQ, idempotent consumers, and a saga pattern to coordinate business processes across services. You'll also need tracing and structured logs just to answer "what happened" when something fails.

The most common way we work is the strangler fig approach: you don't rewrite the monolith, you extract it piece by piece. We identify a business capability with clear boundaries — billing, notifications, inventory — carve it out behind an API, and route traffic gradually. The monolith keeps running, the new service proves itself in production, and you repeat. This is how most successful migrations actually happen.

Be clear-eyed about the bill. Infrastructure costs typically go from tens of euros a month to several hundred, and that's before you factor in Kubernetes clusters, monitoring stacks, and someone who knows how to run them. Operational requirements grow with every service you add. Design typically takes 3–4 weeks; the first extracted service ships in 6–10 weeks. Our engagements start around €4,990 for a focused scoping and extraction plan, €12,900 for a complete first service with CI/CD and observability, and €29,900 for a multi-service programme.

FAQ · Microservices

Microservices architecture: honest answers before you commit

How many services should we start with?
Usually two or three, not twenty. The first extraction is the hardest: you set up the gateway, tracing, deployment pipeline and monitoring from scratch. Once that foundation exists, adding the next service is much cheaper. Starting with ten services on day one is how teams end up with a distributed monolith and a burnout.
How do we avoid building a distributed monolith?
Cut boundaries by business capability, not by technical layer. If two services constantly call each other synchronously and share the same database, they are one service pretending to be two. We use events and queues for communication, keep data ownership explicit, and design each boundary so a team can deploy it without coordinating with others.
Who operates the Kubernetes cluster?
Someone on your team has to, or you pay a provider for a managed platform. We set up the cluster, write the manifests, configure autoscaling and hand over documentation. But the ongoing reality is: upgrades, node failures, certificate rotation and capacity planning don't disappear. Budget for at least one engineer who owns infrastructure part-time.
What does infrastructure cost per month?
A realistic starting range is €400–900 per month for a small production cluster with observability, managed databases and message broker. That's before you add staging environments, backups or multi-region redundancy. Compare that to a €60 VPS running a monolith: the operational bill is the price of independence.
Can we just use a modular monolith instead?
Often yes, and we'll tell you if that's the right call. If you have one team, one deployment rhythm and no extreme differences in load, a well-structured modular monolith gives you most of the clarity at a fraction of the operational cost. Microservices earn their keep when independent release cycles and fault isolation are actual business requirements, not architecture envy.
How do you handle data consistency across services?
We don't use distributed transactions — they don't survive partial failures. Instead we design sagas: each step is a local transaction, and compensating actions roll back the flow if something fails. Every consumer is idempotent, so retries after a crash don't double-charge a customer or create duplicate orders.
How long does the first extraction take?
Plan for 3–4 weeks of design: mapping business capabilities, choosing the first boundary, deciding on events and contracts. The first service extracted from a monolith — using the strangler fig pattern — typically takes 6–10 weeks from kickoff to production traffic. After that, subsequent services go faster because the platform is already in place.

Not sure if microservices are worth it for you?

Tell us what hurts in your current system — we'll say honestly whether this architecture solves it or creates new problems.

Get in touch

Let's talk about your microservices move

A short call or chat to figure out if splitting your monolith is worth it at all. We reply within 60 minutes during working hours (GMT+3).

From monolith to microservices — without the hype

Microservices are not a goal. They are a trade-off. Let's find out if the trade makes sense for you.

We start with a short architecture review: your release bottlenecks, failure domains, team topology and load profile. You get a straight answer — even if that answer is "stay on a modular monolith".

Ask a question first